Summary
We support:
- Consumer protection in financial services primarily through clear and transparent disclosure of fees, terms, and risks, rather than through prohibitions on specific services or pricing structures
- Consumer protection in health and safety based on careful cost-benefit analysis of regulatory impact
If you have already made up your mind, then scroll to the bottom of the page and take the poll to let us know how you feel. If you need to hear more, please read the background section below.
Curious how your views compare? Early input has a meaningful impact—vote below (scroll down) to see the current results.
Your input helps us refine these policy positions.
Background
Consumer Protection in Financial Services
Efforts to regulate banks, credit card companies, and other financial institutions often focus on limiting or prohibiting specific fees or charges. While well-intentioned, such approaches can produce unintended consequences.
Financial services—such as credit cards, checking accounts, and personal loans—are not costless to provide. Institutions operate in a competitive environment and must recover costs through some combination of fees, interest rates, or reduced services.
As a result, when regulations prohibit certain fees or pricing structures, those costs are typically shifted elsewhere—either to other customers, to different types of charges, or through reduced access to services. In some cases, the consumers these regulations are intended to protect may face higher costs or reduced availability of credit.
For this reason, we believe that consumer protection in financial services should focus primarily on transparency. Clear disclosure of fees, terms, and risks allows consumers to make informed decisions while preserving access to a range of financial products.
Short-Term and High-Cost Lending
Regulation of short-term, high-cost lending—often associated with “payday lenders”—raises similar issues.
These services are typically used by individuals who have limited access to traditional credit and need immediate liquidity. The high interest rates associated with these loans reflect elevated default risk and administrative costs rather than a lack of competition among providers.
Prohibiting or severely restricting these services may reduce access to credit for those who have few alternatives. In these cases, the primary role of regulation should be to ensure full and transparent disclosure of loan terms, enabling borrowers to understand the costs and risks involved.
Consumer Protection for Health and Safety
We support consumer protection in areas affecting health and safety, including the roles played by agencies such as the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the United States Department of Agriculture, and the Consumer Product Safety Commission.
In these areas, regulation is essential but should be guided by careful cost-benefit analysis. Regulatory decisions should weigh the benefits of improved safety against the costs imposed on consumers, including higher prices, reduced availability, or delayed access to beneficial products.
We also believe that these agencies should be adequately funded to carry out their responsibilities effectively. In some cases, partial self-funding—such as user fees for reviewing new products—may be appropriate, provided it does not compromise the independence or rigor of the regulatory process.Summary
We support consumer financial service protection in the form of requirements for transparent disclosure of fees and charges rather than prohibition of services or fees. We support consumer protection for health and safety based on a careful cost/benefit analysis of the impact of the regulations.
If you have already made up your mind, then scroll to the bottom of the page and take the poll to let us know how you feel. If you need to hear more, please read the background section below.
Go to the Table of Contents or to the Next Policy Position
Ready to weigh in? At this stage, each vote has a meaningful impact—see the current results after voting.
Your input helps us refine these policy positions.