Summary
We support:
- Pursuing mutually beneficial free trade agreements, such as the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP)
- Including strong protections for intellectual property rights and provisions addressing currency manipulation in trade agreements
- Granting Trade Promotion Authority to the President to negotiate trade agreements efficiently, subject to congressional approval
- Limiting the unilateral use of tariffs by the executive branch and restoring greater congressional oversight to ensure a stable and predictable trade environment
- Maintaining restrictions on the transfer of sensitive technologies to countries that are clearly antagonistic to U.S. national interests
- Providing effective retraining and transition support for workers displaced by trade, automation, or other economic changes
We believe:
- Free trade produces substantial global and domestic benefits but does not, by itself, determine political outcomes in other countries
- Trade policy should be pursued with a clear understanding of both economic and geopolitical realities
- A stable and predictable trade environment is essential for investment, economic growth, and effective international cooperation
If you have already made up your mind, then scroll to the bottom of the page and take the poll to let us know how you feel. If you need to hear more, please read the background section below.
Curious how your views compare? Early input has a meaningful impact—vote below (scroll down) to see the current results.
Your input helps us refine these policy positions.
Background
The Benefits of Trade
The expansion of international trade has played a significant role in reducing global poverty and increasing access to affordable goods and services.
For American consumers, trade provides a wider range of high-quality products at lower prices. For the global economy, it promotes economic development and integration.
Adjustment and Dislocation
Trade also creates economic disruption. Workers in industries exposed to lower-cost foreign competition may lose jobs or face downward pressure on wages.
We do not believe the solution is to restrict trade. Instead, policy should focus on helping workers adjust. This includes:
- Effective retraining and reeducation programs
- Support for geographic mobility
- Reducing barriers to hiring and workforce entry
Programs should be evaluated based on their ability to move displaced workers into new employment.
Free Trade and Fair Trade
We support free trade, but it must operate on a level playing field.
Practices such as currency manipulation can distort trade flows and undermine fair competition. Trade agreements should address these issues and promote more transparent and market-based systems.
Similarly, protection of intellectual property rights should be a central component of trade negotiations.
We oppose broad protectionist policies, including “Buy American” requirements, which tend to increase costs and reduce efficiency.
Tariff Authority and Policy Stability
We are concerned about the increasing use of tariffs as a discretionary policy tool by the executive branch.
Over time, Congress has delegated significant authority to the President to impose tariffs in response to national security concerns or unfair trade practices. These powers were intended to be used selectively and in good faith. However, their broad scope creates the potential for tariffs to be used in ways that introduce uncertainty into the global trading system.
Frequent or unpredictable changes in tariff policy can disrupt supply chains, discourage investment, and undermine confidence among businesses and trading partners. A stable and predictable trade environment is essential for long-term economic planning and growth.
We believe that the use of tariffs should be guided by clear standards, limited in scope, and subject to greater congressional oversight. Trade policy should reflect a consistent, rules-based approach rather than ad hoc or discretionary actions.
National Security and Technology
There are circumstances in which economic policy must be guided by national security considerations.
We support limiting access to sensitive technologies in cases where countries are clearly acting in ways that threaten U.S. interests. These decisions should be made carefully, balancing economic benefits with long-term strategic risks.
Global Strategy and Economic Alignment
Trade policy can also play a role in shaping broader economic relationships.
Efforts to expand trade partnerships with a diverse set of countries can reduce dependence on any single economy and encourage more balanced global development. Agreements such as the Trans-Pacific Partnership were designed in part to support these objectives.
At the same time, we should recognize that trade does not guarantee political convergence. Economic engagement does not necessarily lead to greater political openness or alignment with democratic values.
Conclusion
We support a trade policy that promotes economic growth, global development, and consumer benefits, while remaining attentive to national security concerns and the need to support workers through economic transitions.
Trade should be pursued with both optimism about its benefits and realism about its limits.
Go to the Table of Contents or to the Next Policy Position
Ready to weigh in? At this stage, each vote has a meaningful impact—see the current results after voting.
Your input helps us refine these policy positions.