Summary
We believe that:
- Campaign contributions are a form of constitutionally protected free speech
- Efforts to eliminate money from politics are unlikely to succeed and may conflict with the First Amendment
- The most practical way to counter the influence of special interests is to strengthen support for candidates and organizations that represent the broader public interest
In practice, this means:
- Supporting candidates who prioritize the common good
- Supporting organizations that advocate for the public interest
- Strengthening transparency through enforcement and expansion of disclosure requirements
Curious how your views compare? Early input has a meaningful impact—vote below (scroll down) to see the current results.
Your input helps us refine these policy positions.
If you have already made up your mind, then scroll to the bottom of the page and take the poll to let us know how you feel. If you need to hear more, please read the background section below.
Background
A Practical Approach to Money in Politics
Campaign finance reform is often framed as an effort to reduce or eliminate the influence of money in politics. While well-intentioned, many such efforts face significant constitutional challenges and practical limitations.
We believe that campaign contributions are a form of protected political speech. As a result, attempts to impose strict limits on political spending are likely to face legal obstacles and may not achieve their intended results.
Rather than attempting to eliminate the role of money in politics, we support a more practical approach: ensuring that the public interest is effectively represented within the existing system.
Strengthening the Public Interest
We accept the constitutional reality of money in politics and focus on strengthening the public-interest side of the equation. In our view, the most effective way to counterbalance special interest influence is to increase support for candidates and organizations that act in the broader public interest.
This includes:
- Supporting candidates who demonstrate independence from narrow special interests
- Supporting organizations that advocate for policies benefiting society as a whole
- Encouraging broader participation by voters and donors who are not aligned with specific interest groups
In addition, we support transparency and enforcement of existing campaign finance laws. We would extend public disclosure requirements to charitable 501(c)(3) organizations when they engage in significant political spending, such as donating large sums to super PACs. These organizations are currently exempt from such requirements.
Role of Independent Expenditures
Consistent with this approach, independent-expenditure organizations can play an important role in promoting candidates and policy agendas without direct coordination with campaigns.
These organizations can play a useful role, because they are permitted to raise and spend funds independently, subject to legal restrictions on coordination with candidates and political parties.
Building a Broader Base of Support
At present, our focus is on demonstrating that centrist independent voters represent a significant and influential bloc. Over time, expanding this base of support may provide a meaningful counterweight to more narrowly focused special interest groups.
Go to the Table of Contents or to the Next Policy Position
Ready to weigh in? At this stage, each vote has a meaningful impact—see the current results after voting.
Your input helps us refine these policy positions.